兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 上頁 下頁 首頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#41] MQA Audio Format 那根據 #24 長長影子師兄所講，有咩喇叭重播聲音的分析力還原度較好？如軟件ok，但到喇叭輸出時限制了，前段攪幾多都無用。 |
kx14cp1 正式會員49.xxx.xxx.60 |
2018-07-10 10:12 | |
|
|
|||
| [#42] MQA Audio Format Kent Poon怎可能跟長長影子比較，研發層面與應用層面分別。 |
阿鐵 正式會員 14.xxx.xxx.15 |
2018-07-10 10:34 |
| [#43] MQA Audio Format #41 太多了吧 Grimm, D&D，Genelec.............. |
唐吉訶德 正式會員 51.xxx.xxx.110 |
2018-07-10 11:00 |
| [#44] MQA Audio Format 音響技術層面廣闊，有眾多不同嘅專業領域，應用層面及研發層面各有唔同專精嘅地方，河水不犯井水，亦無必要去比較又無高低之分，但相信技術上可以互相學習交流嘅地方有好多，不過無需要畀人借故煽風點火。 |
長長影子 正式會員 103.xxx.xxx.26 |
2018-07-10 11:13 |
| [#45] MQA Audio Format 影子兄, 冇錯, 各師各法 ! |
7308 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.167 |
2018-07-10 11:19 |
| [#46] MQA Audio Format |
icefox_2001 正式會員 101.xxx.xxx.118 |
2018-07-10 16:02 |
| [#47] MQA Audio Format There are 10000+ MQA albums on Tidal. To see a list of albums check this out: https://www.meridianunplugged.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=268318 The best way to try out MQA is via the 60-day free trial of Tidal HiFi: http://tidal.com/masters (Tidal MQA is delivered in 24-bit. MQA CD is delivered in 16-bit (before any decoding) only. The former is better.) It costs HK$96 per month for lossless 16/44.1 CD-quality streaming, and no additional cost for MQA streaming. Note that to sign up for Tidal one should use a web browser, instead of Tidal app on smartphone, since the latter will charge more than the regular price by Apple or Google. To perform first unfold of MQA (Core decode) to 88.2kHz or 96kHz, you can use the (free) Tidal desktop app for computer, Audirvana, or Roon 1.5. For full decode to highest sample rate you need a MQA certified player such as Lumin product line, Esoteric N-01 / N-05 or TEAC NT-505. For those who prefer Hi-Res streaming instead of MQA streaming, there is Qobuz. You need to create a Qobuz account by VPN to UK or France. Actual streaming does not require VPN, but Hutchison internet services may not stream consistently well enough in my previous testing, with HKBN being a little better and PCCW probably the best for Qobuz streaming. https://www.qobuz.com/gb-en/plans/music-streaming-subscription Qobuz pricing is EUR19.99 per month for 16/44.1 lossless CD streaming, or EUR349.99 per year for Hi-Res streaming, with Hi-Res defined as anything between 24/44.1 to 24/192. Some Hi-Res albums cannot be streamed even if they show up in the catalog, they are for your purchase only. Lumin product line, Esoteric N-01 / N-05, TEAC NT-505 also natively support Qobuz Hi-Res as well. 最後修改時間: 2018-07-10 17:09:50 |
wklie 正式會員 115.xxx.xxx.66 |
2018-07-10 16:55 |
| [#48] MQA Audio Format https://vimeo.com/272083471 https://vimeo.com/272078385 |
icefox_2001 正式會員 101.xxx.xxx.118 |
2018-07-11 11:37 |
| [#49] MQA Audio Format 多謝分享，重點講解得非常之清楚。 |
長長影子 正式會員 103.xxx.xxx.26 |
2018-07-11 12:19 |
| [#50] MQA Audio Format Please have a read of this article from Stereophile. I am 100% with Jon Iverson! https://www.stereophile.com/content/mqa-benefits-and-costs I am very happy to see that we have a lot of exchange of information and opinions on MQA. I respect all chings comments if they are based on solid facts and not self-opinions, "concepts" or "philosophy". Time will tell whether MQA will become a widely accepted format or just a hype that will die in a few years time. Happy listening :) Disclaimer:- My experience with MQA is through my Lumin A1 playing MQA files from Tidal. I am a music lover and not working in the audio industry so have no personal gain or loss whether MQA is going to be successful or not. |
MLfans 會員 113.xxx.xxx.101 |
2018-07-11 18:51 |
| [#51] MQA Audio Format 其實如要 verify 一個 format 或 codec 係咪真係 lossless，只需要客觀地量測及比較 signal chain 之前嘅訊號同之後比較有幾接近，唔同嘅地方喺邊度， signal A ＞ a/d ＞ data A ＞ data B ＞ d/a ＞ signal B 既然 MQA 嘅理念係在於修正器材 a/d d/c 等等偏差，一般傳統所謂嘅 lossless format 只係睇 data A 係咪等如 data B 其實係冇意義嘅，因為真正 lossless 嘅意義係需要比較 signal A 同 signal B 之間嘅差異，而唔係只局限於比較 data A 與 data B 之間嘅差異。 |
長長影子 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.120 |
2018-07-11 20:12 |
| [#52] MQA Audio Format Lossless？ 我完全無法想像 Tidal file 的來源 |
唐吉訶德 正式會員 92.xxx.xxx.159 |
2018-07-11 21:51 |
| [#53] MQA Audio Format #51 完全同意的 |
唐吉訶德 正式會員 92.xxx.xxx.159 |
2018-07-11 22:37 |
| [#54] MQA Audio Format lossless..... hahahaha! 最後修改時間: 2018-07-11 23:02:30 |
dCS 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.116 |
2018-07-11 23:02 |
| [#55] MQA Audio Format Test bench... [96MB]  最後修改時間: 2018-07-12 01:03:13 |
長長影子 正式會員 124.xxx.xxx.72 |
2018-07-12 00:52 |
| [#56] MQA Audio Format Test bench... [742MB] 352kHz 24-bit  最後修改時間: 2018-07-12 01:11:04 |
長長影子 正式會員 124.xxx.xxx.72 |
2018-07-12 01:00 |
| [#57] MQA Audio Format Test bench [49M] 44.1kHz 16-bit  最後修改時間: 2018-07-12 01:11:48 |
長長影子 正式會員 124.xxx.xxx.72 |
2018-07-12 01:09 |
| [#58] MQA Audio Format Listening environment reverberation time ~0.2s  |
長長影子 正式會員 124.xxx.xxx.72 |
2018-07-12 01:18 |
| [#59] MQA Audio Format Listening environment, ~1.8m away from LSPKs, freq response 10Hz ~ 50kHz +/-6dB (1/3rd oct.) without equalisation, with time response & freq response + preference response equalized ~+/-3dB  最後修改時間: 2018-07-12 01:28:32 |
長長影子 正式會員 124.xxx.xxx.72 |
2018-07-12 01:24 |
| [#60] MQA Audio Format Whether MQA sounds better is a subjective opinion and depends on one's preference. However, MQA has not given any proof of his technical claim so far and to the worse, it has been proved that many of its technical claims are in fact lies, such as lossless format. |
MetalNuts 正式會員 210.xxx.xxx.250 |
2018-07-12 10:10 |
